|
|
Deepseawaters
Home Deepseawaters
Articles
Deep
Sea Fish Oil - Complete lead to Natural Deep Sea Fish Oil
Deep Sea Fish Oil - Complete lead to
Natural Deep Sea Fish Oil
An
understanding of the global distribution and temporal trends
of atmospheric methyl bromide (CH3Br) is necessary
to place constraints on the magnitude and distribution of
its sources and sinks. Although evidence suggests that the
atmospheric burden of CH3Br increased during the
1980s, its atmospheric mole fraction does not appear to have
changed significantly during the past decade. Sources of CH3Br
include oceanic production, biomass burning, leaded fuel combustion,
plant and marsh emissions, and fumigation of soils, durable
goods, perishables, and structures. Sinks include photochemical
decomposition in the atmosphere (reaction with hydroxyl radicals
(OH) and photolysis at higher altitudes), loss to soils, chemical
and biological degradation in the ocean, and uptake by green
plants.
The
ozone depletion potential (ODP) of CH3Br
is a function, in part, of its total atmospheric lifetime.
The total atmospheric lifetime, t, is determined by the reciprocal
of the sum of the reciprocal partial atmospheric lifetimes
with respect to each sink:
Table
1
A
substantial change in the ability of any one of these sinks
to remove CH3Br from the atmosphere can result
in a change in the atmospheric lifetime and ODP for this trace
gas. For example, a reduction in the global OH concentration
would result in a longer partial lifetime, tatm, and a larger
ODP. The effect of an increase in the sea-surface temperature
would be more complicated. Oceanic chemical
degradation rates would increase. Alone this would result
in a reduction of the partial lifetime, tocn, and subsequently
the ODP. However, the effect that the increase in SST might
have on the biological production and degradation of CH3Br
is not yet known. Global climate change could alter both the
lifetime and ODP of this trace gas as well as other trace
gases with similarly sensitive sources and sinks. There are
studies currently underway that are beginning to examine the
potential effect that global change may have on the lifetime
and ODP of CH3Br.
Distributions
and Trends
The
number of field and monitoring programs that include CH3Br
has increased over the past few years. While the techniques
and standards used by each investigator differ, recent intercalibrations
combined with ambient measurements indicate that the global
mean atmospheric mixing ratio for CH3Br is between
9 and 10 pmol mol-1 [Kurylo et al., 1999]. From a number of
these field studies, the mean interhemispheric ratio (IHR)
is currently estimated at 1.3 ± 0.1. This ratio appears to
vary seasonally by about 0.2, driven mainly by variations
in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) [Wingenter et al., 1998].
The seasonal cycle observed in the high latitude NH appears
consistent with OH seasonal variability, but is much larger
than the seasonal cycle present in the SH (Figure 1). This
is not consistent with seasonality driven by OH oxidation.
It strongly suggests that the variations of CH3Br
in the troposphere are modulated in good part by other seasonally
varying sources and sinks in one or both hemispheres [Kurylo
et al., 1999].

Figure.1: Seasonality in CH3Br
mixing ratios in both the NH and SH;
The
vertical distribution of CH3Br has been studied
both in the lower stratosphere and in the troposphere. Tropospheric
levels of CH3Br are typically found near the tropopause
as well, although some profiles show a slightly decreased
concentration of CH3Br at the highest altitudes.
Once CH3Br is in the stratosphere, its mixing ratios
drop off rapidly with height, as a significant amount of reactive
bromine is released. For some trace gases, vertical profiles
in the troposphere may be used to put a lower limit on their
lifetimes in the troposphere. A gas with a short atmospheric
lifetime relative to the mixing time in the troposphere and
having only surface sources should exhibit a tropospheric
vertical profile that decreases with increasing altitude.
However, once CH3Br and other gases like it that
have a relatively long lifetime with respect to gas phase
reactions (1.7 y for CH3Br) are released from the
surface, they can become well mixed in the troposphere. There
may be some near-surface gradients as a result of locally
large surface sources or sinks, but this would depend strongly
on local mixing and would not affect the calculated lifetime
of this gas .
Current
monitoring networks did not start measuring CH3Br
regularly until just before the anthropogenic production rate
was frozen by international agreement. The only long-term
record of CH3Br measurements before this period
was reported by Khalil et al. and began in 1978 in the NH
and in 1983 globally. The mean latitudinally-weighted, global
growth rate calculated from these data was 0.15 ± 0.08 pmol
mol-1 y-1 between 1983 and 1992. To obtain an idea
of the earlier trends of CH3Br in the atmosphere,
Butler et al. [1999] measured CH3Br in air that
has been trapped in consolidated snow (firn) in Antarctica
and Greenland. Although the Greenland data suggested unusual
growth of CH3Br in the firn air, which gives rise
to questions about the integrity of an atmospheric imprint
of this gas in the firn, results from Antarctica showed no
signs of this activity. The Antarctic results, taken at face
value, suggest that the CH3Br growth rate increased
from 0.01 pmol mol-1 y-1 in the early 1900s to
0.05-0.06 (±0.01) pmol mol-1 y-1 during the 1970s
and 1980s. The increased growth rate during the 1970's coincides
with increasing use of CH3Br as an agricultural
fumigant and is consistent with the SH measurements of Khalil
et al. [1993] for that period.
Ocean
The
ocean acts as both a source and a sink for CH3Br.
The net flux of CH3Br across the air-sea interface
is controlled by a dynamic balance of in situ production and
degradation as well as degradation during mixing out of the
surface layer. Results from recent laboratory culture studies
suggest that CH3Br is produced by phytoplankton,
although other organisms, such as zooplankton and bacteria
cannot be ruled out as contributors. Methyl bromide is degraded
in seawater via hydrolysis and chloride substitution.
It has been shown that CH3Br also undergoes biological
degradation in tropical waters, which may be due to bacterial
uptake and that these rates are likely significant. Results
from field studies, showing large undersaturations in polar
and subpolar waters, also suggest a significant biological
sink mechanism.
Oceanic
Uptake and Emission
Recent
laboratory studies have greatly improved the parameterizations
for the chemical degradation rate constant, solubility , and
diffusion coefficient of CH3Br. Using these results
and a 2ºx2º gridded global data set of physical properties
of the ocean, Yvon and Butler [1996] calculated a tocn of
2.7 y (2.4 - 6.5 y) for CH3Br. This approach reduced
the uncertainty in the Butler [1994] calculation of tocn by
including the seasonal and spatial variability of the ocean's
physical properties. Nevertheless, significant uncertainties
remain in the calculation of oceanic uptake and lifetime.
The gas exchange coefficient, which is typically calculated
from parameterizations defined by Liss and Merlivat [1986]
or Wanninkhof [1992], imparts a factor of two uncertainty
on the calculation of lifetime and uptake. Recent results
indicate that the known chemical degradation mechanisms are
not the only degradation mechanisms for CH3Br in
the oceans and make this calculation even more uncertain.
Another degradation rate constant term must be included to
account for this additional loss pathway. To date, King and
Saltzman [1997] have reported the only direct measurement
of this additional degradation rate. Moore and Webb [1996],
Lobert et al. [1997], and Grosko and Moore [1998] reported
indirect evidence for this additional degradation, where the
observed saturation anomalies (deviations from air-sea equilibrium)
could only be sustained with degradation rates substantially
larger than the known chemical degradation rates. Yvon-Lewis
and Butler [1997] estimated the magnitude and distribution
of biological degradation from these data and recalculated
a tocn of 1.85 y (1.1 - 3.9 y), which now includes the additional
loss.
A
similar approach can be used to calculate the emission rate
(Figure 2) of CH3Br from the ocean to the atmosphere,
where emission is defined as the fraction of CH3Br
produced in the ocean that reaches the atmosphere before being
degraded in the water. Emission is distinct from evasion,
as emission does not include the return of gas originating
in the atmosphere (Figure 2). (This is similar to uptake and
invasion.) While results from recent laboratory culture studies
suggest that CH3Br is produced, at least in part,
by phytoplankton , the magnitude and distribution of gross
production rates for CH3Br are not known. Therefore,
it has not been possible to calculate the emission rate directly.
Currently, the emission rate must be calculated by difference
between the net flux determined from the measured saturation
anomaly and the uptake rate calculated using known oceanic
degradation mechanisms.

Figure 2. Schematic of the coupled ocean-atmosphere
system, where Pa and Pw are the partial pressures of the species
of interest in air and in the water. The net flux can be calculated
as the difference between evasion and invasion, emission and
uptake, or production and removal. The derivation and mathematical
expressions for these terms are given in Butler and Rodriguez
[1996]. The partial lifetime of atmospheric CH3Br
with respect to oceanic loss is calculated from uptake, which
is an irreversible loss.
Observations
of Net Flux
Results
from a number of recent research cruises are used to determine
the globally averaged net flux of CH3Br across
the air-sea interface. The net flux is calculated
from the difference in the observed partial pressures of CH3Br
in air and dissolved in surface seawater and a calculated
gas exchange coefficient. Not too long ago it was thought
that the oceans were largely supersaturated in CH3Br.
This was noted in the 1994 Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion and it indicated that the oceans were a
significant net source of CH3Br to the atmosphere.
However, recent field studies in the Pacific , the Atlantic,
the Labrador Sea, and the Southern Ocean
have demonstrated that the oceans are a net sink for CH3Br
(Figure 3). The estimated global net flux of -21 Gg y-1
(-11 to -32 Gg y-1) determined by Lobert et al.
[1997] includes data from two cruises with long latitudinal
transects in both hemispheres in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans and one cruise in the Southern Ocean. Grosko and Moore
[1998] calculated a global net flux of -10 Gg yr-1 (-3 to
-13 Gg y-1) from one long transect in the Pacific
Ocean and a regional cruise in the Labrador Sea. The Grosko
and Moore [1998] studies were conducted at different times
of year than that of Lobert et al. [1997], suggesting that
seasonality may play a role in modulating the average global
net flux. One recent study clearly demonstrated a seasonal
cycle in dissolved CH3Br in the shallow waters
of the North Sea and from the above studies there is weak
evidence for seasonal cycling in temperate waters.

Figure 3. Distribution of the methyl bromide
saturation anomaly from Lobert et al.
In
attempts to derive the oceanic net flux of CH3Br from differences
in aquatic production and degradation, Anbar et al. [1996]
and Pilinis et al. [1996] used different models whose results
suggest that the high productivity in the high latitude polar
waters would result in large supersaturations of CH3Br in
these regions. They predicted that polar and subpolar supersaturations
were so large (200% - 500%) that the global net ocean-atmosphere
flux left the oceans as a significant net source of CH3Br
to the atmosphere. To evaluate these predictions, measurements
of the CH3Br saturation anomaly (difference from equilibrium)
were made in the Southern Ocean in early 1996, and showed
a ~35% undersaturation virtually everywhere along the cruise
track. This indicated that the polar oceans were a net sink,
not a net source of CH3Br. Moore and Webb [1996] and Grosko
and Moore [1998] obtained similar results for work in the
Labrador Sea and northern Atlantic Ocean. The most recent
Scientific Assessment on Ozone Depletion
has adopted the -21 Gg y-1 from Lobert et al. [1997]
as the current best estimate for the oceanic net flux of CH3Br,
but has expanded the uncertainty to include measurements of
Groszko and Moore [1998]. This leaves a possible range of
-3 to -32 Gg y-1.
Oceanic
Impact on Atmospheric Budget
A
summary of the CH3Br budget adopted by the most recent WMO
Scientific Assessment for Ozone Depletion: [Kurylo et al.,
1999] is shown in Table 1. Since the assessment was finalized,
additional research has generated emission estimates for some
newly discovered, terrestrial sources of CH3Br. The results
from some of these recent studies are also shown in Table
1. Gan et al. [1998] suggested that the global emission rate
from the rapeseed plant alone is 7 Gg y-1. From
a study of salt marshes, Rhew et al. [1999] estimated that
10% (~14 Gg y-1) of the total CH3Br global emissions
emanated from that source. Varner et al. [1999b], measuring
the flux of CH3Br from a fen and a bog in New Hampshire, put
the global emission rate from wetlands at 4.6 Gg y-1.
An additional small source flux has been observed from rice
fields, 1.5 Gg y-1. The emission of CH3Br from
the fungal decomposition of woody litter has been calculated
at 1.7 Gg y-1 using a model and assuming that the
CH3Br production parallels methyl chloride production .
Table
1. Atmospheric CH3Br budget adapted from Kurylo et
al. [1999] and references therein. Italicized items are from
work that was published after the WMO report was finalized.
Numbers in parentheses represent the range of uncertainty
for the best estimate shown.
| Source
Type |
|
Emissions
(Gg y-1) |
| Oceans |
|
56 (5-130)i |
| Fumigation
- soils |
|
26.5 (16-48) |
| Fumigation
- durables |
|
6.6 (4.8-8.4) |
| Fumigation
- perishables |
|
5.7 (5.4-6.0) |
| Fumigation
- structures |
|
2 (2-2) |
| Gasoline |
|
5 (0-10) |
| Biomass Burning |
|
20 (10-40) |
| Wetlands |
|
4.6b
(?) |
| Plants
- rapeseed |
|
6.6d
(4.8-8.4)) |
| Rice Fields |
|
1.5e
(0.5-2.5) |
| Fungus |
|
1.7f
(0.5-5.2) |
| Total= |
|
151g(56-290) |
| Sink
Type |
|
Uptake
(Gg y-1) |
| Oceans |
|
77 (37-133)i |
| OH and h |
|
86 (65-107) |
| Soils |
|
46.8a
(32-154) |
| Plants |
|
h |
aRevised
total soil uptake including cultivated soil uptake from Varner
et al. [1999a].
bVarner et al. [1999b]
cRhew et al. [1999]
dGan et al. [1998] - net flux.
eRedecker et al. [1999]
fLee-Taylor and Holland [1999]
gTotals are rounded to the nearest integer
hGlobal estimate for plants not yet available
iThe ranges in the oceanic source and sink terms
must conserve the accepted range in the net flux, -3 to -32
Gg y-1. Therefore, the lower limit in uptake, 37
Gg y-1 added to the upper limit for the net flux,
-32 Gg y--1, generates the lower limit in emission,
5 Gg y--1.
Oceanic
uptake of CH3Br is currently estimated at 77 Gg
y-1 [Kurylo et al., 1999; Yvon-Lewis and Butler,
1997]. This is comparable to the atmospheric degradation rate
due to reaction with hydroxyl radicals and photolysis (86
Gg y-1). Combined with losses to soils the total
uptake of CH3Br by sinks with at least partially
known global distributions becomes 210 Gg y-1.
To maintain the net sink of 21 Gg y-1, the estimated
oceanic emission of CH3Br must be 56 Gg y-1.
This leaves only 151 Gg y-1 in total emissions
of CH3Br to the atmosphere (Table 1). The remaining
imbalance in the budget for CH3Br is a 59 Gg y-1
missing source or sources-smaller than that given in the 1998
Scientific Assessment but still large enough to be of concern.
Since the oceanic net flux could be at most 18 Gg y-1
too large, it is unlikely that the missing source will be
found in oceanic fluxes. However, the ocean
does constitute about one third of the budget and we do not
know yet how the ocean will respond to global change in temperature,
radiation or precipitation. Solutions to these questions can
only come from studies of in situ production and degradation
and their dependencies upon temperature, light, nutrients
and other variables that regulate biological processes in
the sea.
Email
To Friend
|